When evaluating the trustworthiness of a website, what does the "Rule of 3" suggest?

The "Rule of 3" in evaluating the trustworthiness of a website emphasizes the importance of comparing three sources of information about a particular topic. This approach encourages users to cross-reference information, which can lead to a more balanced and accurate understanding of the subject matter. By consulting multiple sources, it becomes easier to identify consistent facts and viewpoints, thus increasing confidence in the information being gathered. This method helps reduce the risk of relying on biased or inaccurate data from a single source.

Relying solely on checking different sites for information may lead to redundancy or similarities in reporting, which does not necessarily enhance the depth or validity of understanding. While assessing different credentials is important, focusing exclusively on three credentials might not provide a comprehensive view of the overall trustworthiness of a site. Evaluating the website's layout and design can offer some insights but does not inherently indicate the reliability of the content or the accuracy of the information presented. The "Rule of 3" specifically targets source comparison as a key method for establishing credibility.